Atlas Contents
- • Morphology of the normal heart
- ◦ Surfaces and grooves of the heart
- ◦ Attitudinally Appropriate Terminology
- ◦ The pericardium
- ◦ The caval veins
- ◦ The aorta and its branches
- ◦ The pulmonary trunk and its branches
- ◦ Gross anatomy of the atria
- ◦ The atrioventricular junctions
- ◦ Fibrous skeleton of the heart
- ◦ The conduction system of the heart
- ◦ The Bachmann bundle
- ◦ Gross anatomy of the ventricles
- ◦ The coronary arteries
- ◦ The coronary sinus and its tributaries
- • The approaches
- • Fluoroscopic anatomy correlation
- • Anatomy for ablation
- ◦ Right atrial flutter/ tachycardia
- ◦ AV node reentry
- ◦ “Septal and Paraseptal” accessory pathways
- ◦ “Para-Hisian” accessory pathways
- ◦ Left free wall accessory parthways
- ◦ Right free wall accessory parthways
- ◦ “Unusual variants” of ventricular pre-excitation
- ◦ Atrial fibrillation and left atrial flutter /tachycardia
- ◦ Right and left outflow tract ventricular tachycardia
- ◦ The ventricles and papillary muscles
- ◦ The left ventricular summit
- ◦ Ventricular tachycardia and structural heart disease
- • Epicardial ablation of arrythmias
- • Anatomy for left atrial appendage closure
- • Extracardiac structures
- • The autonomic nervous system
- • The AV conduction axis for permanent pacing
- • The AV conduction axis and the aortic root
- • Development of the heart
- • Ablation of congenital heart diseases
Anatomy for ablation
Right atrial flutter and tachycardia
Right atrial tachyarrhythmias do not arise in a featureless chamber. Their circuits and focal sources are organized by the junctions between smooth and trabeculated myocardium, by atrioventricular and venoatrial vestibules, by naturally thin or fibrofatty regions, and by acquired lines of block. The most useful anatomical approach therefore begins by identifying the type of arrhythmia: cavotricuspid-isthmus-dependent macroreentry, non-isthmus-dependent macroreentry, or focal atrial tachycardia. These categories can overlap in the same patient, particularly after surgery or previous ablation, and the surface electrocardiogram cannot by itself establish the full circuit. [1–4,18]
1 The right atrium as an arrhythmic chamber
In attitudinally appropriate orientation, the right atrium has a smooth-walled venous component receiving the superior and inferior caval veins, a trabeculated appendage, the vestibule of the tricuspid valve, and the interatrial septal surface. The crista terminalis is the prominent muscular boundary between the smooth venous component and the pectinated appendage. It begins superiorly near the anterolateral aspect of the superior cavoatrial junction, curves along the lateral wall, and becomes less distinct inferiorly as its fibres merge with the pectinate muscles and the inferior atrial wall. On the epicardial surface, the terminal groove corresponds approximately—but not invariably—to the crest. [1,2,5]
The crista terminalis is more than a visible ridge. Its longitudinally aligned myocytes conduct rapidly along the crest, whereas changes in fibre orientation and connective tissue at its margins can produce marked transverse anisotropy. Depending on rate, direction of activation, and atrial disease, the crest may behave as a preferential conduction pathway, a functional line of block, or part of the boundary of a reentrant circuit. The pectinate muscles that arise from it are irregular in number, thickness, and distal extension. Some reach the tricuspid vestibule and the cavotricuspid isthmus, creating muscular bundles separated by thinner intertrabecular tissue. [5,6]
The intercaval posterior wall is not a true anatomical septum. It lies behind the septal surface and is related externally to mediastinal tissues. The true interatrial septum is confined largely to the floor and immediate rim of the oval fossa. This distinction matters when activation maps are displayed as if the entire medial right atrial wall were septal. Descriptions such as lateral, anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior should be applied in bodily orientation, not according to an isolated heart placed on its apex. [3,4]
2 Cavotricuspid-isthmus-dependent atrial flutter
Typical atrial flutter is a macroreentrant tachycardia revolving around the tricuspid valvar orifice and using the cavotricuspid isthmus as an obligatory inferior corridor. The superior and inferior caval orifices, the crista terminalis, areas of functional block, and the tricuspid junction shape the remainder of the circuit. In the common form, activation descends the lateral right atrial wall, crosses the isthmus from inferolateral to paraseptal, and ascends the medial wall; the reverse sequence defines reverse typical flutter. The conventional terms counterclockwise and clockwise depend on the viewing projection and should be accompanied by an explicit anatomical description. [7–9]
The anatomical cavotricuspid isthmus extends from the inferior cavoatrial junction to the hinge line of the inferior leaflet of the tricuspid valve. It is not a uniform strip. It can be divided into a paraseptal component, continuous with the floor of the triangle of Koch and the right-sided boundary of the inferior pyramidal space; a central or inferior component; and an inferolateral vestibular component. The central-inferior route is often the shortest and thinnest target for a linear lesion, but patient-specific anatomy determines the effective path. The electrophysiological isthmus is the surviving channel required by the circuit and may not coincide with the apparently shortest geometric line. [2,4,10,11]
Anteriorly, the isthmus contains the smooth vestibule supporting the inferior tricuspid leaflet. Posteriorly, it is bounded by the inferior caval orifice and the Eustachian valve or ridge. Pectinate muscles may extend onto its lateral and posterior portions, while the more central vestibular region is usually smoother. The Eustachian ridge may be low and inconspicuous or thick and prominent. A mobile Eustachian valve, a Chiari network, or a sharply angulated ridge can hinder catheter contact and create conduction gaps at the posterior end of a lesion line. [1,2,10]
A sub-Eustachian or sub-Thebesian recess is a frequent source of anatomical complexity. The recess may be shallow, but when deep it produces an abrupt change in contour, locally increases the tissue path that must be crossed, and makes stable contact and transmural lesion formation more difficult. The endocardial surface can therefore appear continuous on a three-dimensional shell while the catheter is positioned on one wall of a pouch rather than across its floor. Intracardiac echocardiography, angiography, or pre-procedural cross-sectional imaging can disclose this geometry when conventional ablation does not achieve block. [10–13]
Tissue thickness also varies. The central-inferior isthmus is commonly thin, whereas the vestibular region near the tricuspid hinge, pectinate muscle insertions, and the Eustachian ridge can be substantially thicker. Respiratory and cardiac motion alter the apparent length and angle of the isthmus. Consequently, a long procedure does not necessarily imply an electrically resistant substrate: failure may reflect poor contact on a ridge, an unrecognized recess, an epicardial bridge, or a lesion line placed through unnecessarily thick tissue. [10–13]
The right coronary artery and the small cardiac vein course in the epicardial tissues of the right atrioventricular groove, close to the anterior end of the isthmus. Their precise distance from the endocardium varies. Flow within a vessel may reduce local heating, while excessive energy near the groove can damage the coronary artery. More medially, the paraseptal isthmus approaches the inferior extensions of the atrioventricular node and the artery supplying the conduction axis. This is one reason to favour an appropriately placed central or inferolateral line when feasible and to avoid interpreting the entire inferior atrial floor as equally safe. [1,2,10]
3 Mapping the isthmus and proving block
The anatomical objective in typical flutter is interruption of every viable muscular connection between the inferior cavoatrial boundary and the tricuspid valvar hinge. Termination of flutter during energy delivery is encouraging but insufficient: it may represent transient slowing or a change to another circuit. The accepted endpoint is persistent bidirectional conduction block across the completed line, demonstrated by pacing and activation sequence on both sides, with differential pacing or other validated manoeuvres when the result is uncertain. The endpoint is electrical, but its achievement depends on understanding the three-dimensional substrate. [7–9]
Electroanatomical mapping should be interpreted together with catheter position and chamber anatomy. Widely split potentials can support local block, yet fractionated or double potentials may also arise from anisotropic trabeculated myocardium. Conversely, an apparent gap may be a far-field signal. When block remains incomplete, systematic inspection of the ventricular end near the tricuspid hinge, the posterior Eustachian ridge, and any recess is more informative than indiscriminate extension of the lesion set. A more lateral line may avoid a deep recess, although it can cross thicker pectinate extensions; a more medial line may be shorter but approaches the conduction system. Each alternative exchanges one anatomical difficulty for another. [10–13]
4 Non-isthmus-dependent right atrial macroreentry
Not every right atrial macroreentrant tachycardia is typical flutter. Previous atriotomy, cannulation, congenital heart surgery, patch material, catheter ablation, or spontaneous atrial scar can create fixed and functional barriers around which activation circulates. Common critical corridors lie between a scar and the inferior or superior caval orifice, between adjacent scars, or between scar and the tricuspid junction. In repaired congenital heart disease, several loops may coexist and share a narrow channel; interruption of one loop may reveal another. [14,15]
The term incisional tachycardia is useful only when the surgical incision is actually part of the circuit. A low-voltage area is not automatically an impenetrable barrier, and a line drawn on a three-dimensional map does not establish continuity of scar. High-density activation mapping, entrainment interpreted with caution, and demonstration of conduction block are required to define the practical isthmus. The operator should also test whether the cavotricuspid isthmus participates, because CTI-dependent flutter can coexist with scar-related circuits and may use an altered superior pathway. [14,15]
Ablation should connect verified barriers across the narrowest safe critical corridor. The anatomical endpoints may be a caval orifice, the tricuspid junction, a surgical patch, or a dense scar that has been shown to be electrically inert. Extending a lesion towards an assumed scar boundary risks leaving a conducting gap or unnecessarily damaging normal atrial myocardium. Proximity to the sinus node, phrenic nerve, atrioventricular conduction axis, and coronary arteries must be considered according to the selected corridor. [3,4,14]
5 Focal right atrial tachycardia
Focal atrial tachycardia is defined by centrifugal activation from a localized source, although the underlying mechanism may be automaticity, triggered activity, or a microreentrant circuit too small to resolve with routine mapping. In structurally normal hearts, the crista terminalis is the most frequent right atrial site. Classical and contemporary series show clustering along the long axis of the crest rather than random distribution over the atrial wall. The anisotropic architecture of the crista terminalis can favour local conduction delay and reentry, while its myocardial phenotype may also support non-reentrant focal mechanisms. [5,6,16]
Activation mapping usually identifies the earliest endocardial signal on or immediately adjacent to the crest, often with rapid centrifugal spread and preferential propagation along the ridge. Intracardiac echocardiography can confirm that the catheter is on the crista rather than on a neighbouring pectinate muscle. At superior sites, the sinus node and right phrenic nerve are relevant structures at risk. High-output pacing can help identify phrenic capture, but lack of capture is not a perfect anatomical guarantee. Energy delivery close to the sinus node should be guided by the activation map during sinus rhythm as well as during tachycardia. [5,16]
Other focal sources cluster around the tricuspid vestibule, coronary sinus ostium, inferior paraseptal region, superior and inferior cavoatrial junctions, right atrial appendage, and para-Hisian region. These labels describe regions, not mechanisms. A tachycardia earliest near the coronary sinus ostium may originate in the right atrial vestibule, within the coronary sinus musculature, or across the inferior pyramidal space on the left atrial side. Similarly, a para-Hisian activation pattern can reflect a focus on either side of the atrial septal surfaces or near the non-coronary aortic sinus. Mapping should therefore compare anatomically adjacent chambers before energy is delivered beside the conduction axis. [1–4]
The right atrial appendage has a broad trabeculated body and a variable distal tip. A focal source may lie deep within its pectinated recesses, where catheter stability and wall thickness are difficult to judge. At the cavoatrial junctions, myocardial sleeves extend for variable distances onto the caval veins. Focal activity from these sleeves must be distinguished from inappropriate sinus tachycardia and from reentry involving the superior right atrium. The earliest local electrogram is necessary but not sufficient: the spatial pattern of activation, response to pacing, behaviour with adrenergic stimulation, and relationship to surrounding anatomy together establish the diagnosis. [1,2,4]
6 Integrating anatomy with the ablation strategy
The central anatomical question is different for each arrhythmia. In CTI-dependent flutter, the task is to close an inferior corridor and prove bidirectional block. In scar-related macroreentry, it is to identify the true protected channel and connect verified barriers. In focal tachycardia, it is to localize the source while protecting structures that may lie immediately beyond the thin atrial wall. Treating all three as variants of ‘right atrial flutter’ obscures these distinctions and encourages lesion sets that are either incomplete or unnecessarily extensive.
Three-dimensional mapping provides activation and voltage information, not a direct histological map. Intracardiac echocardiography adds real-time information about ridges, recesses, trabeculations, catheter contact, and neighbouring structures. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can clarify chamber geometry and surgical reconstructions. The most reliable interpretation arises when these modalities are registered mentally and, where possible, electronically in attitudinal orientation. Anatomical variability should be expected, documented, and used to explain mapping findings rather than treated as a procedural anomaly. [3,4,12]
Key Anatomical Messages
Arrhythmia or region | Anatomical implication |
CTI-dependent flutter | The obligatory inferior corridor lies between the inferior cavoatrial junction and the inferior tricuspid hinge; durable bidirectional block is the endpoint. |
Difficult CTI ablation | Look for a prominent Eustachian ridge, deep sub-Eustachian recess, thick pectinate extensions, poor contact, or an epicardial bridge before enlarging the lesion set. |
Paraseptal CTI | A short route may approach inferior AV nodal extensions and the artery supplying the conduction axis; anatomical proximity limits indiscriminate energy delivery. |
Scar-related macroreentry | Define the practical isthmus between verified barriers; low voltage alone does not prove electrically inert scar. |
Crista terminalis tachycardia | Longitudinal fibre alignment and transverse anisotropy create a preferred arrhythmic region; superior ablation requires attention to the sinus node and phrenic nerve. |
Focal paraseptal tachycardia | Map the anatomically adjacent right atrium, left atrium, coronary sinus, and aortic root when appropriate before ablating near the AV conduction axis. |
References
- Cabrera JA, Sánchez-Quintana D. Cardiac anatomy: what the electrophysiologist needs to know. Heart. 2013;99:417–431. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301154.
- Sánchez-Quintana D, Doblado-Calatrava M, Cabrera JA, Macías Y, Saremi F. Anatomical basis for the cardiac interventional electrophysiologist. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:547364. doi:10.1155/2015/547364.
- Anderson RH, Mori S, Sánchez-Quintana D, et al. How best to describe the location of the substrates for abnormal cardiac rhythms. Heart Rhythm. 2024;21:2377–2385. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.066.
- Althoff TF, Anderson RH, Goetz C, et al. Regionalization of the atria for 3D electroanatomical mapping, cardiac imaging, and computational modelling: a clinical consensus statement. Europace. 2025;27:euaf134. doi:10.1093/europace/euaf134.
- Sánchez-Quintana D, Anderson RH, Cabrera JA, et al. The terminal crest: morphological features relevant to electrophysiology. Heart. 2002;88:406–411.
- Kalman JM, Olgin JE, Karch MR, Hamdan M, Lee RJ, Lesh MD. ‘Cristal tachycardias’: origin of right atrial tachycardias from the crista terminalis identified by intracardiac echocardiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1998;31:451–459.
- Cosío FG, López-Gil M, Goicolea A, Arribas F, Barroso JL. Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior vena cava–tricuspid valve isthmus in common atrial flutter. American Journal of Cardiology. 1993;71:705–709.
- Saoudi N, Cosío F, Waldo A, et al. Classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiologic mechanism and anatomic bases. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2001;12:852–866.
- Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2016;133:e506–e574.
- Cabrera JA, Sánchez-Quintana D, Ho SY, Medina A, Anderson RH. The architecture of the atrial musculature between the orifice of the inferior caval vein and the tricuspid valve: the anatomy of the isthmus. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 1998;9:1186–1195.
- Cabrera JA, Sánchez-Quintana D, Farré J, Rubio JM, Ho SY. The inferior right atrial isthmus: further architectural insights for current and coming ablation technologies. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2005;16:402–408.
- Saremi F, Pourzand L, Krishnan S, et al. Right atrial cavotricuspid isthmus: anatomic characterization with multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2008;247:658–668.
- Marcos-Alberca P, Sánchez-Quintana D, Cabrera JA, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographic features of the inferior right atrial isthmus: role of vestibular thickness in catheter ablation of atrial flutter. European Heart Journal–Cardiovascular Imaging. 2014;15:32–40.
- Nakagawa H, Shah N, Matsudaira K, et al. Characterization of reentrant circuit in macroreentrant right atrial tachycardia after surgical repair of congenital heart disease. Circulation. 2001;103:699–709. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.103.5.699.
- Stevenson IH, Kistler PM, Spence SJ, et al. Scar-related right atrial macroreentrant tachycardia in patients without prior atrial surgery: electroanatomic characterization and ablation outcome. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2:594–601.
- Morris GM, Segan L, Wong GR, et al. Atrial tachycardia arising from the crista terminalis: detailed electrophysiological features and long-term ablation outcomes. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2019;5:448–458. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2019.01.014.
- Soto N, Datino T, Gonzalez-Casal D, et al. Anatomical knowledge for the ablation of left and right atrial flutter. Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie. 2022;33:124–132. doi:10.1007/s00399-022-00865-9.
- Meyer C, Kahle AK, Dagres N, et al. Management of patients with atrial tachycardia: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC, endorsed by HRS, APHRS, LAHRS, and AEPC. Europace. 2025;27:euaf324. doi:10.1093/europace/euaf324.